nader. don't even get me started on nader. please. do we need change? yes. do we need more than two parties? yes. is it smart to cut our noses off to spite our faces. no. we have george w. in office only because all those liberal dems with "high ideals" voted for nader.

i know you all will hate it when i quote dr. phil, but i'm going to anyway: "do you want to be right, or do you want to be happy?"

ask the nader people that, ask them why we're at war for a different reason every week.

Ralph W. Nader is a lying piece of pond-scum. Don't blame the Democrats for treating him no better than LaRouche; because he IS no better. He's a ridiculous snob, he doesn't work or play well with others, and after decades of political activism, all his adoring fans can show for it is a "wake-up call" - as if he were the only one awake in 2000.

He claimed to be pro-environment, but instead of rallying other environmentalist groups to his banner, he trashed them as "servile" and "sellouts." Then he lied about there being no difference between Democrats and Republicans. Then, after the difference became obvious, one of his campaign managers said that no one anticipated how radical the Bush crowd would be. Hello? The Democrats anticipated just that, which proves they're smarter than the Naderites.

Nader is no better than the German Communists who allied themselves with the Nazis, against the Social Democrats, in 1933.